About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, January 1 - 7:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I came across this phrase in David Kelley’s Evidence and Justification. I have only begun to scratch the surface on Kant so I’m in need of some assistance in order to grasp what is meant by this phrase. From my current level of understanding, Kant argued that in order to know something there must be the external world acting on the senses but also a set of a priori conceptual categories into which the mind automatically places the objects of awareness. Is this what is meant?Thanks.

Post 1

Sunday, June 14 - 8:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

You did not get an answer. One reason might be that no one knows what Kant meant by what he said, whether you read the original German or an English translation. 



Post 2

Wednesday, June 24 - 3:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

 

Tim, you are on the right track. Kant thought that the sensory uptakes do not become an experience unless concepts are applied to those uptakes. Experience of an object such as a table requires recognition under a concept <table>. Only at that point have the sensory inputs become cognitive, in Kant's picture. Furthermore, there is no cognition of any objects, empirical or mathematical, as objects at all without application of the most fundamental conceptual categories to them. Those categories are his famous 12, which are kin to the various logical forms of judgment and which are had by us a priori, that is, independently of our sensory uptakes from the world.



Post 3

Friday, June 26 - 5:50amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

If you say that's what Kant said, Stephen, then fine. I'd like to read it from him.  What you wrote seems similar to statesments from Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. Without a percept, a sensation has no meaning. You have the feeling, but it exists without any context, without any meaning. The essential difference as I understand it (Rand being easier to understand than Kant), is that concept formation and abstraction are efforts of will, not pre-existing "forms" to which we conform our perceptions.

 

(Edited by Michael Marotta on 6/26, 5:51am)



Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.