About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3


Sanction: 14, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 14, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 14, No Sanction: 0
Post 60

Thursday, August 24, 2006 - 2:00pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I wonder why people are claiming to know what they don't know and can't know - on both sides. Since when is infinity or finiteness built into the fundamental axioms?

"I don't know" is a valid position for some issues. Epistemologically, the Objectivist theory of concepts can handle both possibilities.

I prefer to wait and see what science comes up with on this one - or die in my blessed ignorance if this knowledge doesn't come in my lifetime.

Michael






Post 61

Friday, August 25, 2006 - 2:08pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Glenn wrote,
Bill,
As usual, you have shown "infinite" patience. But as Robert sarcastically said: I just don't get it. Your arguments are clever, but so were Zeno's. I'll have to think about it some more. Nothing you have said has affected my intuition that it's possible that I can go in some direction and count the objects in the universe and keep going and keep counting and never reach the end. It's possible that for every integer there is a different object in the universe. Infinite sets can exist and the universe may be one of them.
Part of the problem may stem from a confusion between abstract numbers and concrete objects. A number set isn't finite in the same way that a set of objects is finite. A set of numbers can go on infinitely, in the sense that however far you've counted, you can always count another number. But observe that in the process of counting another abstract number, you are mentally creating that number; you aren't finding it, as you would be if you were counting actual objects that you discover in the real world. In other words, the number doesn't already exist in the way that another object that you discover already exists. So there is no limit on how many abstract numbers you can count, because you are mentally creating them as you go, whereas there is a limit on how many objects you can discover: the limit is the number that actually exists in the real world.

What you are saying, when you say that the number of objects in the universe is infinite is that for every object in the universe, there is yet another object -- which is a contradiction, because since every object exhausts all the objects, there cannot be another object. The notion of an actual infinity of existents is, therefore, self-contradictory. In fact, you can't even imagine it.

What you can imagine is to find another object in addition to the objects you've already found and to continue doing so without reaching an end. But observe that to imagine not reaching an end is to imagine doing so within a finite period of time, which leaves open the possibility that if you were to continue the process, you would reach an end. In order truly to imagine the existence of an infinite number of objects in the universe, you would have to imagine counting them for an infinite period of time, which is impossible.

- Bill



Post 62

Friday, August 25, 2006 - 2:20pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I just sent a post to this thread, but it never got posted. I see that my name is up on the general forum as having posted it, but neither my name nor my post appears anywhere in the actual thread itself.

What's going on?

Bill

P.S. Ah, I see that it just got posted. But it didn't appear until several minutes after I submitted it, which is uncharacteristic. In fact, it didn't get posted until I submitted this followup. Normally, the posts I submit appear either immediately or upon refreshing my screen. Has this lag happened to anyone else?
(Edited by William Dwyer
on 8/25, 2:29pm)




Post 63

Friday, August 25, 2006 - 5:17pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Ask Rod Serling............ ;-)



Post 64

Friday, August 25, 2006 - 5:25pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Bill asks "In fact, it didn't get posted until I submitted this followup. Normally, the posts I submit appear either immediately or upon refreshing my screen. Has this lag happened to anyone else?"

Occasionally the server is interrupted when someone is posting.  It manages to save the data, but before it can regenerate the forum page, it gets stopped for no good reason.  When someone adds a post, it suddenly shows up because it just got printed.

I've seen it a number of times.  In fact, it will often be shown on the front page, and when you click through to the forum, it's not there.  And it doesn't remove it from the front page either.  All predictable from the software, except the initial interruption which makes no sense and I blame on someone else.




Post 65

Saturday, August 26, 2006 - 3:48pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I've noticed that happening too.

"This Is Not Rod Serling Speaking."




Post 66

Thursday, September 7, 2006 - 4:16pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Hi Bill,

You wrote, “In order truly to imagine the existence of an infinite number of objects in the universe, you would have to imagine counting them for an infinite period of time, which is impossible.”

This formulation improperly imposes the limitations of consciousness on existence—improperly, because existence exists independently of consciousness.

In any case, there is no problem imagining counting entities for an infinite period of time because existence is eternal, so there is no limit to the future that can be spent counting entities and therefore no limit (in logic) to the number that can be counted.



(Edited by Jon Letendre
on 9/07, 5:00pm)




Post 67

Monday, October 6 - 7:55amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

Supplements to #33 are this one and these.




Post 68

Monday, October 6 - 9:11pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

(Edited by Jay Abbott on 10/06, 9:12pm)




Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.