About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, October 3 - 12:52pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Well written, Tibor!

I wish an expanded version of your short article, detailing all of the disasters that are on the way, could be broadcast to the entire nation like Galt's speech.






Post 1

Friday, October 3 - 1:21pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
A fantastic article Tibor. I second Steve's wish. What a breath of fresh air it would be to have anyone on the public stage say even 20% of what you pack in here. Of course, it will require a "takeover" of the airwaves to get this message out, because no news outlet would let anything like this pass unfiltered and undistorted to the general public.

Regards,
--
Jeff



Post 2

Friday, October 3 - 2:34pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I am working on the take over of all the broadcast and even narrow cast outlets but, alas, my meager resources make this difficult! :-)



Post 3

Friday, October 3 - 3:05pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Tibor, please let me know if I can contribute to your project. Unfortunately, I won't have much money available - it is currently all going to pay off bailouts, whereas my personal bailout request has yet to be approved.



Post 4

Friday, October 3 - 8:08pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Tibor,

Great article. Now if each one of us could send it in a letter to the editor of our local papers, and send copies to our congressmen...

Unfortunately, most papers slice and dice such letters to fit their page, and most congressmen... well, its wasted on them. Unfortunately. The Political Class.

Seriously, there are many good articles posted on this site. It'd do a heart good to see some of them reach a much broader audience. Is there any pipeline/could there be any pipelines to the popular media that ROR might exploit to promote distribution of some of these articles?

Does anyone have some connections that they might offer?

jt
(Edited by Jay Abbott on 10/03, 8:10pm)




Post 5

Saturday, October 4 - 1:59amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Freedom News Wire syndicates my columns among Freedom Communications, Inc.,  newspapers but I work for them all, so I get my columns around through this means.
(Edited by Machan on 10/04, 9:57am)




Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 6

Sunday, October 5 - 4:44pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

While I share Tibor's general sentiments about freeloaders and the demand for hand-outs, I don't think that this is the essense of what is happening.  The "bailout" is not aimed at the low-income public, but rather at the financial institutions that created the mess by offering loans at unrealistic terms that would naturally default in time, on the assumption, no doubt, that the feds would bail them out.

This is virtually a paradigm example of the essential evil of the corporation as such - capitalism so long as it makes money - socialism when the unjustified risks come due, as befits a child of the state.




Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 7

Wednesday, October 8 - 6:10amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
The financial institutions did not create any mess but did what any prudent person would do when given the chance to provide easy credit which is made possible through the interference of the government.  The Clinton administration, for example, instructed Fanny and Freddy to help the poor by lending money at extraordinarily easy terms.  Indeed, the whole housing industry has been distorted by government intervention--e.g., mortgage interest deductions! Why this subsidy? Well, the argument was that returning soldiers needed a boost when they tried to buy homes.  Perhaps a more cynical explanation is that politicians needed their votes to wield power. Not that the private sector didn't support much of this statism but for that to be possible the politicians must first make it evident that they may be enlisted to engage in wealth redistribution, handing out special favors, etc., etc.



Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Post 8

Wednesday, October 8 - 12:16pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
BTW, I think when a professional take a bribe, the main fault is with him or her, not the bribe provider.  The professional puts up a sign, "I can be bought," which opens the door to corruption.  It is he or she who is first and foremost obligated to resist the bribe, as a matter of integrity.
(Edited by Machan on 10/08, 3:52pm)




Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 9

Wednesday, October 8 - 2:27pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I agree completely with Tibor. It bugs me when people treat corporations as the primary force or primary agent of immorality and the government officials as secondary in this kind of problem. When someone says that our government is being run by corporations, or that the military-industrial complex sets government priorities, or that it is the 'evil corporations' that are fault, or that greedy wall street is the cause of this crisis, it is so naive. Just in simple market terms, the government official has close to a monopoly - only he can sell legal privileges, and there are a large number of character-challenged special interests that are willing to line up and pay bribe money. People have to put on particularly dark-tinted ideology glasses to take the other view.



Post 10

Wednesday, October 8 - 3:24pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Steve, Tibor,

Excellent observations. It seems society is pre-disposed (brainwashed) to see the issue from the politician's perspective, and blame corporations foremost.

jt



Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.